Future of Devices w/ Dr. Vic Ross
Guest expert dermatologist Dr. Vic Ross joins Dr. Bass to review technologies that have come to market in recent years and preview the pipeline for the future of aesthetics.
Looking back on the history of aesthetic medicine, a pivotal breakthrough was the ability to precisely target abnormal areas of skin rather than damaging the skin globally.
As this advancement transformed aesthetic treatments, researchers continued to find ways to make these technologies more powerful, cost effective, and conveniently sized.
Although device companies put more resources into market research today than ever before, innovation still takes time.
Dr. Ross predicts what the next big breakthrough will be and how it will help make treatments faster, safer, and more effective.
About guest expert dermatologist Dr. Vic Ross
Expert dermatologist Dr. Vic Ross specializes in laser treatments and is an active researcher on skin rejuvenation approaches. He was elected president of the American Society for Laser Medicine and Surgery (ASLMS) and is an active board member in the American Society of Dermatologic Surgery.
- Learn more about Dr. Vic Ross
- Learn more about laser treatments at Bass Plastic Surgery
About Dr. Lawrence Bass
Innovator. Industry veteran. In-demand Park Avenue board certified plastic surgeon, Dr. Lawrence Bass is a true master of his craft, not only in the OR but as an industry pioneer in the development and evaluation of new aesthetic technologies. With locations in both Manhattan (on Park Avenue between 62nd and 63rd Streets) and in Great Neck, Long Island, Dr. Bass has earned his reputation as the plastic surgeon for the most discerning patients in NYC and beyond.
To learn more, visit the Bass Plastic Surgery website or follow the team on Instagram @drbassnyc
Subscribe to the Park Avenue Plastic Surgery Class newsletter to be notified of new episodes & receive exclusive invitations, offers, and information from Dr. Bass.
00:00:00,180 --> 00:00:03,050
Welcome to Park Avenue
Plastic Surgery Class,
2
00:00:03,051 --> 00:00:06,610
the podcast where we explore controversies
and breaking issues in plastic
3
00:00:06,611 --> 00:00:10,410
surgery. I'm your cohost, Doreen
Wu, here with Dr. Lawrence Bass,
4
00:00:10,480 --> 00:00:14,170
Park Avenue plastic surgeon,
educator, and technology innovator.
5
00:00:14,850 --> 00:00:18,850
Today we are joined by Dr. Vic Ross
to talk about the future of devices in
6
00:00:18,851 --> 00:00:22,210
aesthetic medicine and the role of
the partnership between professional
7
00:00:22,211 --> 00:00:24,970
societies and industry in
producing these devices.
8
00:00:26,450 --> 00:00:31,250
Delighted that Dr. Ross has agreed
to join us again on the podcast.
9
00:00:31,251 --> 00:00:35,730
Dr. Ross is a board
certified dermatologist
10
00:00:35,870 --> 00:00:40,810
who works at the Scripps Clinic
in San Diego, California. He is,
11
00:00:40,811 --> 00:00:45,170
had a long career in
laser and device based
12
00:00:45,650 --> 00:00:46,483
research.
13
00:00:47,460 --> 00:00:51,930
He has served as the past president
of the American Society for Laser
14
00:00:52,330 --> 00:00:53,163
Medicine in surgery,
15
00:00:53,340 --> 00:00:57,810
as well as on the board of
directors of the American Society of
16
00:00:57,811 --> 00:00:59,170
Dermatologic Surgery.
17
00:01:00,540 --> 00:01:05,290
He completed the laser clinical
and research fellowship at the
18
00:01:05,291 --> 00:01:10,130
Wellman Labs at Massachusetts General
Hospital that launched him on his career
19
00:01:10,500 --> 00:01:12,930
in lasers and devices.
20
00:01:12,931 --> 00:01:16,370
But he's contributed tremendously in the,
21
00:01:17,660 --> 00:01:22,570
if I can say it, decades
since then to this field.
22
00:01:23,090 --> 00:01:24,450
So welcome Dr. Ross.
23
00:01:24,910 --> 00:01:26,890
I'm glad to be here. Good to be back.
24
00:01:26,890 --> 00:01:31,370
Dr. Bass, we've talked about the role
of devices in aesthetic medicine before.
25
00:01:31,740 --> 00:01:32,970
In a capsule summary,
26
00:01:32,971 --> 00:01:36,450
what were the main breakthroughs that
gave rise to this revolutionary role of
27
00:01:36,451 --> 00:01:37,284
devices?
28
00:01:37,600 --> 00:01:41,660
The big sentinel breakthrough
29
00:01:42,240 --> 00:01:47,140
was the recognition that by
delivering very short pulses
30
00:01:47,150 --> 00:01:48,260
of laser light,
31
00:01:48,720 --> 00:01:53,220
and by selecting the
amount of energy and the
32
00:01:53,221 --> 00:01:55,020
wavelength or color of light,
33
00:01:55,370 --> 00:02:00,180
that you could confine the
effects of laser treatments to
34
00:02:00,181 --> 00:02:02,380
the target within the skin,
35
00:02:02,390 --> 00:02:07,260
to the abnormal part of the skin that
you were trying to damage or change
36
00:02:07,870 --> 00:02:11,940
instead of just damaging
the skin globally.
37
00:02:12,120 --> 00:02:15,380
And that went by the term
selective photothermalisis.
38
00:02:15,700 --> 00:02:20,380
That was something that was first
published in the early 1980s from the
39
00:02:20,381 --> 00:02:24,980
Wellman Labs by Dr. Rox
Anderson and the then
40
00:02:25,260 --> 00:02:27,300
director of the laboratory, John Parrish.
41
00:02:27,800 --> 00:02:32,620
And that really revolutionized
the use of these devices for
42
00:02:32,730 --> 00:02:36,100
skin disorders and
cosmetic skin treatments.
43
00:02:37,410 --> 00:02:40,860
Okay. So devices are here to
stay. What is happening now?
44
00:02:41,460 --> 00:02:45,220
I'm wondering what are the
main developmental avenues
in technology taking place
45
00:02:45,660 --> 00:02:46,493
currently?
46
00:02:46,680 --> 00:02:48,360
Yeah, I think they're twofold. Well,
47
00:02:48,560 --> 00:02:52,280
one is incremental improvements in
some of the devices we already have.
48
00:02:52,760 --> 00:02:57,280
So from an engineering perspective,
efficiency perspective, cost,
49
00:02:57,640 --> 00:03:02,280
and size devices are certainly more
reliable than they were 25, 30 years ago.
50
00:03:03,320 --> 00:03:04,153
More powerful.
51
00:03:04,960 --> 00:03:08,600
And they tend to do a better job
and cover larger areas faster.
52
00:03:09,120 --> 00:03:11,240
So let's take laser hair
removal, for example.
53
00:03:12,160 --> 00:03:15,720
The early device may have had a 10
millimeter spot size the size of a penny,
54
00:03:16,440 --> 00:03:19,600
and you have to go maybe
at one pulse per second.
55
00:03:20,000 --> 00:03:22,960
So imagine doing a whole back that
way for laser hair reduction or leg,
56
00:03:23,160 --> 00:03:24,480
that would take quite a while. Now,
57
00:03:25,440 --> 00:03:28,880
devices typically have spots that
are three or four times larger.
58
00:03:29,880 --> 00:03:32,120
They can fire at two pulses per second.
59
00:03:32,520 --> 00:03:36,520
So you're talking about covering a
back and maybe eight minutes or less
60
00:03:38,000 --> 00:03:40,320
whereas that might have taken
45 minutes to an hour before.
61
00:03:40,640 --> 00:03:44,480
So some of the technology
involves better reliability,
62
00:03:46,520 --> 00:03:51,360
speed, comfort, safety,
those types of things. Also,
63
00:03:51,680 --> 00:03:55,680
we've seen what I call navigational aids
added to several devices. For example,
64
00:03:56,920 --> 00:03:59,520
there's one device that measures the
skin pigment with a little meter,
65
00:04:00,600 --> 00:04:04,360
and then that provides settings
for the provider based on say,
66
00:04:04,600 --> 00:04:08,320
if you're tanned or untanned.
So that's one thing.
67
00:04:08,440 --> 00:04:10,560
The other thing is the
devices oftentimes have
68
00:04:12,240 --> 00:04:15,320
application driven menus on
like a tablet type of thing.
69
00:04:15,640 --> 00:04:19,880
So you push a button and let's say you
want to treat a leg vein, for example,
70
00:04:20,680 --> 00:04:22,200
the laser may have settings.
71
00:04:22,360 --> 00:04:26,400
If you push leg vein and you push the
size of the vein and where it is on the
72
00:04:26,560 --> 00:04:27,393
face versus a leg,
73
00:04:27,520 --> 00:04:31,000
it'll provide you some
recommended settings from the
manufacturer that are built
74
00:04:31,240 --> 00:04:33,960
in. So those are some incremental
things that have been done.
75
00:04:34,960 --> 00:04:38,240
They're not necessarily revolutionary,
but on a daily practical level,
76
00:04:38,241 --> 00:04:40,600
they mean a lot to the
practitioner and to the patient.
77
00:04:40,601 --> 00:04:43,480
And the other side of the picture,
78
00:04:43,481 --> 00:04:45,520
we have just brand new
things that are happening.
79
00:04:45,521 --> 00:04:49,440
In other words things that have
involved different types of
80
00:04:49,820 --> 00:04:54,640
technologies altogether. For
example, using cold to destroy fat,
81
00:04:54,641 --> 00:04:59,160
the advent of fractional lasers
over the last 15 to 20 years,
82
00:04:59,161 --> 00:05:04,160
we've put little holes in the skin and
that's really allowed us to do lots of
83
00:05:04,161 --> 00:05:06,680
new things. I think in the future,
84
00:05:06,681 --> 00:05:10,040
we'll see as Dr. Bass has
talked about in the past,
85
00:05:10,041 --> 00:05:13,240
maybe optical diagnosis. In
other words, you use a scanner,
86
00:05:13,590 --> 00:05:16,680
some type of tool to
tell what is in the skin.
87
00:05:16,681 --> 00:05:18,280
So you might not have to get a biopsy,
88
00:05:18,281 --> 00:05:22,520
you would just be able to go over the
skin and find out whether somebody has a
89
00:05:22,521 --> 00:05:25,520
tumor or not. So these are some things,
and there are a lot more things,
90
00:05:25,521 --> 00:05:28,760
but just very briefly, these are some
things that are happening and will happen.
91
00:05:29,640 --> 00:05:32,080
Robotics that'll happen
even probably later. But,
92
00:05:32,081 --> 00:05:33,760
so there's a lot of new
things on the horizon.
93
00:05:34,450 --> 00:05:36,010
Let's move into application.
94
00:05:36,200 --> 00:05:40,610
What clinical problems are being chased
or might be addressed more effectively
95
00:05:40,611 --> 00:05:41,490
by these technologies?
96
00:05:41,960 --> 00:05:46,650
Yeah, probably the hottest
thing right now is is acne.
97
00:05:46,890 --> 00:05:50,490
There are two devices now that have,
one is already FDA cleared for acne.
98
00:05:51,490 --> 00:05:53,370
The other hopefully will be cleared soon.
99
00:05:53,730 --> 00:05:57,200
And these are using devices that
target sebum directly, directly.
100
00:05:57,520 --> 00:06:00,880
So all of us have these glands that
reduce grease on our skin called sebaceous
101
00:06:01,360 --> 00:06:04,880
glands. And if you don't have
sebaceous glands, you won't have acne.
102
00:06:06,000 --> 00:06:09,320
That's largely why little kids don't
get acne. Their skin always looks nice,
103
00:06:09,720 --> 00:06:11,800
even if they're going to have
bad acne when they're 12 or 14,
104
00:06:12,040 --> 00:06:14,680
if you see a six year old kid,
they look pretty darn good.
105
00:06:15,400 --> 00:06:18,240
So if you can destroy those
glands or make them smaller,
106
00:06:19,160 --> 00:06:21,840
the acne should diminish quite a bit.
107
00:06:22,200 --> 00:06:25,120
And so we have new lasers that
target those glands specifically.
108
00:06:26,120 --> 00:06:28,320
But it's a challenge
because the targets are
109
00:06:30,320 --> 00:06:33,600
hard to treat without
damaging the normal skin.
110
00:06:33,800 --> 00:06:37,240
It involves a lot of complex
interactions between cold and heat.
111
00:06:37,440 --> 00:06:39,600
So that's one of the
biggest frontiers, I think,
112
00:06:40,000 --> 00:06:43,280
as far as something entirely new
that we haven't done in the past.
113
00:06:44,490 --> 00:06:49,480
So I'm curious to hear
your thoughts about how
114
00:06:49,800 --> 00:06:54,560
industry decides what technologies
to work on and how they
115
00:06:54,561 --> 00:06:56,200
choose clinical problems.
116
00:06:57,240 --> 00:06:57,731
Yeah,
117
00:06:57,731 --> 00:07:01,170
I think the first thing that industry
looks at is how common the problem is.
118
00:07:01,171 --> 00:07:04,210
I mean, if it's a common problem,
it's more worth pursuing,
119
00:07:04,211 --> 00:07:07,930
like body contouring with Coolsculpting,
for example, or cryolipolysis.
120
00:07:08,490 --> 00:07:13,370
Everybody has some fat somewhere they
probably would like to remove or move
121
00:07:13,371 --> 00:07:17,170
around to a different
position. And likewise, acne,
122
00:07:17,171 --> 00:07:19,930
97% of people have acne at
some point in their lives.
123
00:07:19,931 --> 00:07:21,530
So I think if things are common,
124
00:07:22,080 --> 00:07:26,690
that motivates the laser
industry to pursue that problem.
125
00:07:26,691 --> 00:07:29,370
Cellulite, another, I mean, these
are things that are very common.
126
00:07:30,680 --> 00:07:33,810
Skin looseness and the alternative
means skin tightening. Again,
127
00:07:33,850 --> 00:07:36,650
everybody has some loose
skin somewhere after age 50.
128
00:07:37,100 --> 00:07:40,970
So I think common things happen commonly,
129
00:07:40,971 --> 00:07:45,410
and that's the greatest motivator
for device industry to move toward
130
00:07:45,730 --> 00:07:46,563
solutions.
131
00:07:47,110 --> 00:07:47,851
And you know,
132
00:07:47,851 --> 00:07:52,770
I think aesthetic medicine is
such a mainstream concern of the
133
00:07:53,050 --> 00:07:54,210
public nowadays,
134
00:07:55,090 --> 00:07:59,930
that the companies really
put a big effort into market
135
00:08:00,610 --> 00:08:01,050
research,
136
00:08:01,050 --> 00:08:06,050
trying to understand what things
really bother people bother them enough
137
00:08:06,330 --> 00:08:10,170
that they want to get some treatment
for it, as well as, as you said,
138
00:08:10,490 --> 00:08:14,850
looking at what's most
common. And in that sense,
139
00:08:14,851 --> 00:08:19,450
I think they've gotten much more
on the job in recent decades
140
00:08:20,250 --> 00:08:22,730
compared to 30,
141
00:08:23,050 --> 00:08:26,250
40 years ago where it
was more happenstance.
142
00:08:26,890 --> 00:08:29,890
Whatever they thought they could
chase, they might try to do it.
143
00:08:30,210 --> 00:08:34,890
Now they're really drilling down
on what bothers most of us most
144
00:08:35,450 --> 00:08:36,283
often.
145
00:08:36,370 --> 00:08:37,290
No, that's right.
146
00:08:37,690 --> 00:08:41,730
And sometimes there are common problems
that you would think a device would work
147
00:08:41,930 --> 00:08:43,970
well for and in fact would work well for.
148
00:08:44,090 --> 00:08:48,250
But it hasn't been quite as successful
as you would predict. An example,
149
00:08:48,330 --> 00:08:50,970
there's a microwave device for
sweating underarm sweating.
150
00:08:51,090 --> 00:08:53,690
It works remarkably well when
my daughters had it done,
151
00:08:53,970 --> 00:08:57,920
and we've had patients who've lauded
as maybe the best thing they've done in
152
00:08:58,120 --> 00:09:00,960
their life, but yet the device, I don't,
I mean, it's been somewhat successful,
153
00:09:02,160 --> 00:09:06,000
but market research said like 30 million
Americans or 40 million Americans have
154
00:09:06,200 --> 00:09:07,720
excessive under arm sweating.
155
00:09:07,960 --> 00:09:11,400
But there's a very small percentage of
those patients who will pay money to have
156
00:09:11,800 --> 00:09:15,200
their sweating treated, even if it's
something that interferes their lifestyle.
157
00:09:16,200 --> 00:09:18,800
So oftentimes market research,
I think, although it's
158
00:09:21,040 --> 00:09:24,800
helpful and I'm always amazed when
I see some companies say, Well,
159
00:09:25,520 --> 00:09:28,240
we actually queried all these patients,
160
00:09:28,600 --> 00:09:32,000
and all of them said they would do
this or this if they had this problem.
161
00:09:32,000 --> 00:09:34,240
But I look at it and I say
no, I don't think they would.
162
00:09:34,241 --> 00:09:36,200
I think when people fill
out these questionnaires,
163
00:09:36,550 --> 00:09:37,880
I don't know who they're talking to.
164
00:09:37,881 --> 00:09:40,320
I think sometimes the
companies are too optimistic.
165
00:09:40,740 --> 00:09:44,560
And I'll use an example as my brother.
My brother has severe underarm sweating,
166
00:09:44,561 --> 00:09:48,200
and he would never do a microwave
laser procedure. He just,
167
00:09:48,201 --> 00:09:49,720
because he wouldn't want
to pay for it, you know,
168
00:09:49,721 --> 00:09:52,800
he's just not something he would
do. Although on a questionnaire,
169
00:09:52,801 --> 00:09:54,240
he'd probably say, "Oh,
170
00:09:54,241 --> 00:09:57,360
underarm sweating impacts my life."
And so the company would say, "Well,
171
00:09:57,710 --> 00:10:01,160
this would be a guy who would do it."
So there's a little disconnect, I think.
172
00:10:01,161 --> 00:10:04,640
And same thing with acne. Even
though all these people have acne,
173
00:10:04,641 --> 00:10:06,520
I'm a little bit concerned, you know,
174
00:10:06,521 --> 00:10:10,880
how many people would actually undergo
a somewhat painful procedure to treat
175
00:10:10,881 --> 00:10:12,920
their acne that wouldn't
be covered by insurance.
176
00:10:13,370 --> 00:10:16,600
So there's a lot of I think,
177
00:10:16,601 --> 00:10:18,440
and you don't necessarily
know until you do it.
178
00:10:18,441 --> 00:10:21,880
I think the companies aren't at fault
sometimes for pursuing these things
179
00:10:22,840 --> 00:10:27,040
because I'm not a businessman and I
might think this is great and it's fun to
180
00:10:27,041 --> 00:10:30,280
pursue these different projects
from a scientific perspective.
181
00:10:31,020 --> 00:10:35,800
But in the end, the procedures cost money
182
00:10:37,300 --> 00:10:40,640
and some procedures people are willing
to pay for and some they're not.
183
00:10:40,641 --> 00:10:44,480
And it's odd. You can't always predict
what those procedures are going to be.
184
00:10:44,990 --> 00:10:45,960
Yeah, I mean,
185
00:10:46,160 --> 00:10:51,160
there's some testing bias in asking
people in the abstract or even
186
00:10:51,161 --> 00:10:55,840
asking them if they're participating
for free in a clinical trial.
187
00:10:55,841 --> 00:11:00,560
And we see this all the time where
patients are very satisfied with the free
188
00:11:00,561 --> 00:11:05,320
treatment they got in a clinical
trial, but in real world application
189
00:11:07,240 --> 00:11:10,960
where they have to pay to come in the
office instead of get paid to come in the
190
00:11:10,961 --> 00:11:13,160
office, it's not quite as pleasing.
191
00:11:13,940 --> 00:11:18,430
Absolutely. Absolutely. Yeah. Yeah. So
sometimes the companies miss the mark,
192
00:11:18,431 --> 00:11:22,230
I think, and they, I
think are a little bit,
193
00:11:23,270 --> 00:11:26,230
probably not skeptical enough about the
number of people who walk in the door.
194
00:11:27,140 --> 00:11:31,790
I mean, tattoo removal's another issue
where we would've thought 25 years ago,
195
00:11:31,791 --> 00:11:35,670
we'd have lines of people coming in
for a tattoo removal, and in fact,
196
00:11:35,671 --> 00:11:38,190
we're better at tattoo removal
than we were 25 years ago.
197
00:11:38,191 --> 00:11:41,590
But we still have lots of patients
out there with tattoos. And frankly,
198
00:11:41,591 --> 00:11:45,150
a lot of people now since
tattoos are so acceptable,
199
00:11:45,151 --> 00:11:48,350
they don't necessarily want their tattoos
off like they might have 25 years ago.
200
00:11:48,351 --> 00:11:51,390
So some things changed, perceptions
changed to certain things too.
201
00:11:51,391 --> 00:11:54,360
And so these things that
people would say, "Well,
202
00:11:54,970 --> 00:11:58,840
so many millions of Americans have
tattoos." And the the problem is
203
00:11:59,660 --> 00:12:03,680
the acceptance of tattoos is in flux.
So maybe those denominators are large,
204
00:12:03,681 --> 00:12:06,840
but the number of people would
have or want their tattoo off,
205
00:12:06,841 --> 00:12:10,560
particularly with 8, 10, 20
treatments would be relatively small.
206
00:12:10,560 --> 00:12:13,150
Dr. Bass, Dr. Ross,
207
00:12:13,151 --> 00:12:16,910
you are both members of professional
societies and leaders in what they're
208
00:12:16,911 --> 00:12:17,490
doing.
209
00:12:17,490 --> 00:12:21,950
I'm wondering how do the
societies contribute to the
advancements of all these
210
00:12:21,951 --> 00:12:25,430
wonderful new treatments and really
understand where and how they work?
211
00:12:25,990 --> 00:12:27,320
Well, I think the societies,
212
00:12:28,350 --> 00:12:32,360
I think they establish
some balance in some,
213
00:12:32,990 --> 00:12:34,880
I think they ground, I think
214
00:12:36,790 --> 00:12:39,840
some of the procedures in
the sense that people are,
215
00:12:40,950 --> 00:12:44,880
I think looking at more peer
reviewed publications and studies.
216
00:12:45,650 --> 00:12:48,600
If you go to industry sponsored workshops,
217
00:12:48,601 --> 00:12:52,440
and I've participated in those, they're
always a little biased. You know,
218
00:12:52,441 --> 00:12:56,000
if you watch a Chevrolet commercial
for their Chevrolet truck,
219
00:12:56,001 --> 00:12:59,560
they're going to say the truck is the
best and it's better than the F-150 and
220
00:12:59,561 --> 00:13:01,520
the Ram and all that sort
of thing, which is fine.
221
00:13:01,780 --> 00:13:04,080
And if you go to those types
of events, you expect that.
222
00:13:04,081 --> 00:13:06,680
But the societies at
least are supposed to.
223
00:13:06,681 --> 00:13:10,080
And I think largely they're
pretty successfully doing
it better than we have in
224
00:13:10,081 --> 00:13:10,914
the past.
225
00:13:11,400 --> 00:13:16,120
Having sort of a
nonbiased venue to look at
226
00:13:16,121 --> 00:13:19,960
different procedures and
different technologies and
how they're evolving and how
227
00:13:19,961 --> 00:13:20,840
they might help people.
228
00:13:20,841 --> 00:13:24,840
And looking at also some negative
features of some technologies.
229
00:13:24,850 --> 00:13:29,360
So I think the societies provide that
type of venue for professionals and also
230
00:13:29,550 --> 00:13:33,880
they provide education in hopefully
a relatively unbiased fashion.
231
00:13:34,090 --> 00:13:38,480
So I think the societies are helpful
for providers and in the long run that's
232
00:13:38,481 --> 00:13:42,560
helpful for the consumer
because those providers receive
233
00:13:43,520 --> 00:13:48,440
better education and better
skills and hopefully take that
234
00:13:48,441 --> 00:13:49,274
back to their clinic.
235
00:13:49,950 --> 00:13:54,520
I think that's exactly right. I
mean, when new technologies come out
236
00:13:56,020 --> 00:13:59,800
and so many new technologies
are coming out these days or,
237
00:13:59,890 --> 00:14:04,880
or improvements or iterations of
existing technologies that it's hard to
238
00:14:04,881 --> 00:14:05,714
keep up.
239
00:14:05,780 --> 00:14:10,720
And so the society give a forum to hear
about the totality of what's out there,
240
00:14:11,810 --> 00:14:16,160
to see some of the data
presented and to have a critical
241
00:14:16,161 --> 00:14:18,960
discussion amongst a
broad range of colleagues.
242
00:14:19,140 --> 00:14:23,720
And we've all been present
when there are really diverse,
243
00:14:23,721 --> 00:14:25,480
contentious points of view,
244
00:14:25,780 --> 00:14:29,960
and that's really constructive
in helping each provider
245
00:14:30,310 --> 00:14:35,080
stay up to date and make sure that
they're really delivering everything they
246
00:14:35,081 --> 00:14:37,400
can to do their best for the patient.
247
00:14:37,630 --> 00:14:41,040
Absolutely. I mean, sometimes we call
out our colleagues and say, you know,
248
00:14:41,041 --> 00:14:43,360
I think that's a bunch of booey, you know,
249
00:14:43,470 --> 00:14:45,320
what you just said doesn't make any sense.
250
00:14:45,321 --> 00:14:49,040
So we were just at a controversy
meeting in Santa Barbara a month ago,
251
00:14:49,041 --> 00:14:51,040
and there's always good banter.
It's friendly, friendly,
252
00:14:51,041 --> 00:14:55,280
but it's good because I think it helps
everybody to stay a little honest and
253
00:14:55,520 --> 00:14:56,353
critical.
254
00:14:56,630 --> 00:15:00,940
So what do you think are the main themes
going forward in terms of modern energy
255
00:15:00,941 --> 00:15:01,900
tissue interactions?
256
00:15:02,640 --> 00:15:03,473
You know,
257
00:15:03,830 --> 00:15:08,260
there's a continued role
for short pulse treatments.
258
00:15:08,261 --> 00:15:11,900
These are picosecond pulsed
259
00:15:12,730 --> 00:15:14,620
lasers or even shorter.
260
00:15:15,240 --> 00:15:18,980
And some of the effects that take
place with these lasers are not totally
261
00:15:19,320 --> 00:15:22,780
photothermal light being
converted into heat,
262
00:15:22,781 --> 00:15:26,620
but photo acoustic or even biostimulatory.
263
00:15:26,960 --> 00:15:31,180
And so I think we're going to
see more of that. And there's,
264
00:15:31,181 --> 00:15:36,140
even though we went to
pulse treatments to confine
265
00:15:36,360 --> 00:15:41,220
the thermal effect and
injury and not damage skin,
266
00:15:41,221 --> 00:15:46,140
there's been really a renaissance of bulk
heating treatments for skin remodeling
267
00:15:46,141 --> 00:15:50,820
on the body and face and for tightening
and lifting effects as well as for
268
00:15:50,821 --> 00:15:51,860
targeting fat.
269
00:15:54,310 --> 00:15:57,380
We will see continued refinement in
270
00:15:59,060 --> 00:16:01,740
pulse treatments,
selective photothermalisis,
271
00:16:02,340 --> 00:16:06,740
there are still refinements and
iterations coming along with hardware
272
00:16:06,770 --> 00:16:07,603
advances.
273
00:16:08,610 --> 00:16:09,301
Yeah, I agree.
274
00:16:09,301 --> 00:16:13,900
I think another thing that's going to
happen is we're going to see more a true
275
00:16:14,340 --> 00:16:16,740
robotic type of treatments
where the device, for example,
276
00:16:17,140 --> 00:16:21,460
might find a blood vessel on the face
and target that almost like a drone over
277
00:16:21,660 --> 00:16:26,100
the face. And you would have a tool
that would do your spectroscopy,
278
00:16:26,460 --> 00:16:28,260
which is a tool to find
maybe red or brown,
279
00:16:28,540 --> 00:16:29,900
and then it would target those spots.
280
00:16:30,180 --> 00:16:34,540
So you would have the advantage of
not even having to do the procedure.
281
00:16:34,820 --> 00:16:38,620
You could have a person turn on a
machine and it would find the spots.
282
00:16:38,940 --> 00:16:43,420
You could go through a conveyor belt like
a TSA like baggage going through TSA.
283
00:16:43,620 --> 00:16:47,100
You would have your body go through there
and it would find the spots and target
284
00:16:47,340 --> 00:16:51,380
the spots. You come out the other side
and red and brown spots, for example,
285
00:16:51,660 --> 00:16:53,620
or hair follicles might
be selectively targeted.
286
00:16:54,300 --> 00:16:58,260
And then you would come out the other
side and be done which would be a faster
287
00:16:58,580 --> 00:17:00,660
way to do it. So that
technology's evolving quickly.
288
00:17:01,220 --> 00:17:05,100
And some companies are already,
I think starting to look at that.
289
00:17:06,110 --> 00:17:10,620
So we're going to see a lot more
integration between diagnostics and
290
00:17:10,621 --> 00:17:14,140
therapeutics and the same
tools that, although, you know,
291
00:17:14,141 --> 00:17:16,740
it always amazes me how long things take.
292
00:17:16,741 --> 00:17:21,620
So when I was in the lab starting
in 1994 with optical diagnostics,
293
00:17:21,621 --> 00:17:23,780
there's a device called
confocal microscopy.
294
00:17:23,781 --> 00:17:26,460
And one of my colleagues
was working hard on that,
295
00:17:26,461 --> 00:17:30,020
and I would've thought 28 years later
we'd have that at the bedside. You know,
296
00:17:30,021 --> 00:17:32,820
I would take a little tool,
I would run it over the skin,
297
00:17:32,821 --> 00:17:35,660
but there are a lot of
complexities and challenges there.
298
00:17:35,661 --> 00:17:40,220
So although I think some of
these things are going to happen,
299
00:17:40,221 --> 00:17:41,660
maybe not as fast as we thought.
300
00:17:41,660 --> 00:17:45,220
One of my other colleagues was working
for a company called General Scanning,
301
00:17:45,560 --> 00:17:49,880
and they were looking at a way to target
blood vessels. We had had rabbit ears,
302
00:17:49,881 --> 00:17:51,680
they would find the rabbit
ear, find the vessel,
303
00:17:51,681 --> 00:17:55,720
and target the blood vessel in the
rabbit ear. But now, 28 years later,
304
00:17:55,890 --> 00:17:58,720
we still don't have a tool
that does that in real life.
305
00:17:59,090 --> 00:18:03,840
So things take a long time
and I would've said in 1994,
306
00:18:03,840 --> 00:18:06,760
we're going to see, well, we probably
throw away our punch biopsies.
307
00:18:06,761 --> 00:18:09,160
We don't need to be cutting people
to find out what's going on.
308
00:18:09,161 --> 00:18:10,160
But we're not there yet.
309
00:18:10,161 --> 00:18:13,720
So maybe it's going to take longer
than I think to get to the next step.
310
00:18:14,500 --> 00:18:19,080
But, you know, you raised that
issue of diagnostic modalities,
311
00:18:19,081 --> 00:18:24,000
either standing alone or mated
to search out the pathology
312
00:18:24,001 --> 00:18:26,680
for therapeutic intervention.
313
00:18:29,000 --> 00:18:32,440
There is this big push
to use optical devices,
314
00:18:33,520 --> 00:18:38,320
harnessing them to help evaluate skin
lesions, sort of an optical biopsy.
315
00:18:39,050 --> 00:18:43,960
So how do you think that's going to
play into the future of skin cancer
316
00:18:44,000 --> 00:18:46,880
diagnosis and treatment
over the next decade?
317
00:18:48,510 --> 00:18:52,840
I know you just said, you know, it
may not go there as fast as we think,
318
00:18:52,841 --> 00:18:56,440
and people have been looking at
these things for decades now. But,
319
00:18:56,700 --> 00:19:01,080
but on another level, I feel like
we may be at a watershed point.
320
00:19:01,720 --> 00:19:02,600
What do you think?
321
00:19:02,990 --> 00:19:06,440
Yeah, I mean, again, I would've said
earlier we'd be there, but you know,
322
00:19:06,441 --> 00:19:09,360
I think our training, for
example, in dermatology,
323
00:19:09,440 --> 00:19:12,240
we do a lot of dermatopathology
is a big part of our training,
324
00:19:12,600 --> 00:19:13,440
probably more than any other,
325
00:19:13,441 --> 00:19:18,000
especially we do a lot of pathology
and we look at slides and we do typical
326
00:19:18,790 --> 00:19:20,800
biopsies and that's how we're trained.
327
00:19:20,801 --> 00:19:25,320
So it would be transformative
to go through a training
program where your first
328
00:19:25,321 --> 00:19:27,080
day of residency, somebody
would say, "Well, look,
329
00:19:27,081 --> 00:19:31,320
we're going to have this bedside tool
where we just scan the scan and you look
330
00:19:31,321 --> 00:19:33,000
at it. And that's another tool we have.
331
00:19:33,001 --> 00:19:36,960
And maybe that patient doesn't need
a biopsy. That's just not happening.
332
00:19:36,961 --> 00:19:40,360
I don't know when that's going to
happen. You have a lot of challenges.
333
00:19:40,361 --> 00:19:43,480
Who's going to interpret
these optical biopsies?
334
00:19:43,970 --> 00:19:47,160
Do you send it to the pathologist?
The scan like ultrasound,
335
00:19:47,161 --> 00:19:50,520
You can do ultrasound, for
example, at the bedside for veins.
336
00:19:50,521 --> 00:19:53,080
A lot of people do that
when they treat leg veins.
337
00:19:53,081 --> 00:19:55,120
They don't send it to the
radiologist to look at.
338
00:19:55,121 --> 00:19:57,880
They just look at it themselves
and make a call right there.
339
00:19:57,881 --> 00:20:02,600
So who's going to be responsible for the
final interpretation of these types of
340
00:20:02,800 --> 00:20:06,040
scans? And who's going to
get reimbursed? I mean,
341
00:20:06,280 --> 00:20:10,480
reimbursement's a big issue if you're
taking the time to do a procedure,
342
00:20:10,790 --> 00:20:13,520
a diagnostic procedure, and
there's no reimbursement.
343
00:20:13,521 --> 00:20:18,400
That's been a big issue with
these non biopsy tools or
344
00:20:18,540 --> 00:20:20,040
nontraditional biopsy tools.
345
00:20:20,050 --> 00:20:24,280
So these are things that are happening
very slowly and it's hard to know how
346
00:20:24,281 --> 00:20:27,160
it's all going to kind
of cull out over the next
347
00:20:28,680 --> 00:20:31,560
10 or 15 years, but I think
it's going to be years many,
348
00:20:31,561 --> 00:20:36,000
many years before we replaced
our traditional biopsies.
And the other thing is,
349
00:20:36,001 --> 00:20:38,160
traditional biopsies
are the gold standard,
350
00:20:38,260 --> 00:20:42,120
and the other noninvasive biopsy
tools typically are helpful,
351
00:20:42,121 --> 00:20:45,800
but they don't provide the
same amount of detail or depth.
352
00:20:46,330 --> 00:20:49,000
So I think we have a long way to go.
353
00:20:49,710 --> 00:20:53,080
It's tantalizing because
you can see the potential,
354
00:20:53,081 --> 00:20:57,640
but you've very clearly pointed
out a lot of the obstacles as well.
355
00:20:58,100 --> 00:20:58,690
You know,
356
00:20:58,690 --> 00:21:03,240
devices are an important
modality in modern skincare,
357
00:21:03,241 --> 00:21:08,160
but there's also been explosive growth
in our understanding of the biology
358
00:21:08,850 --> 00:21:13,760
of communication among cells in
the skin and elsewhere in the body.
359
00:21:14,980 --> 00:21:19,600
And just like many medications
have been overtaken for
360
00:21:19,710 --> 00:21:24,600
conditions by biologicals
the same thing is
361
00:21:24,601 --> 00:21:26,560
really happening in skin.
362
00:21:27,330 --> 00:21:31,440
Do you think this will eclipse energy
options or will there be some kind of
363
00:21:32,010 --> 00:21:33,800
synergy between these options?
364
00:21:34,430 --> 00:21:38,400
Yeah, that's a great point. I mean, I'll
use psoriasis as an example. You know,
365
00:21:38,401 --> 00:21:39,920
we use an excimer laser,
366
00:21:39,921 --> 00:21:44,200
which is a ultraviolet laser for
psoriasis in vitiligo. At the same time,
367
00:21:44,201 --> 00:21:46,520
we have these great biological tools.
368
00:21:47,040 --> 00:21:51,000
One of the creams just got approved
for vitiligo recently with these new
369
00:21:51,400 --> 00:21:52,880
so-called jak inhibitors.
370
00:21:53,210 --> 00:21:57,760
So we kind of are having two
roads that we have this biological
371
00:21:57,761 --> 00:21:59,640
road and this energy based road.
372
00:21:59,641 --> 00:22:01,600
And I think there is some
synergy between the two.
373
00:22:02,150 --> 00:22:06,960
I think eventually for systemic
skin diseases like psoriasis
374
00:22:07,920 --> 00:22:10,120
the biological tools will win out. I mean,
375
00:22:10,121 --> 00:22:14,960
I say if I was building
UV lasers for the future,
376
00:22:15,200 --> 00:22:19,240
I would think you might be going the
way of the elevator operator. You know,
377
00:22:19,241 --> 00:22:20,800
I don't know if you'd
have great job security,
378
00:22:20,801 --> 00:22:22,240
because I think with the advances,
379
00:22:22,790 --> 00:22:27,480
like you pointed out about cell
to cell connections and cytokines
380
00:22:27,600 --> 00:22:32,040
and the better understanding of the
biology of these different diseases,
381
00:22:32,041 --> 00:22:36,560
that it could be that these types of
drugs are going to take over and devices
382
00:22:36,561 --> 00:22:40,560
would be displaced completely.
Other things, so like blood vessels,
383
00:22:40,561 --> 00:22:42,440
broken blood vessels, brown lesions,
384
00:22:43,080 --> 00:22:47,000
I don't think that's going to be an area
where these types of biological tools
385
00:22:47,001 --> 00:22:47,960
are going to be as helpful.
386
00:22:48,810 --> 00:22:51,160
On the more technical side
of things, I'm curious,
387
00:22:51,630 --> 00:22:56,560
what engineering details
could manufacturers develop
to make devices more user
388
00:22:56,720 --> 00:22:57,450
friendly?
389
00:22:57,450 --> 00:22:57,450
Devices,
390
00:22:57,450 --> 00:23:02,160
I think that's a tough question because
there's a lot of simultaneous things
391
00:23:02,161 --> 00:23:04,520
going on. We say user
friendly for the provider.
392
00:23:05,680 --> 00:23:09,200
I think it's going to be
cooler, quieter, smaller lasers,
393
00:23:10,000 --> 00:23:14,920
more application driven menus where the
provider has more input from the device.
394
00:23:14,921 --> 00:23:18,440
The device interrogates the skin, maybe
provides some input to the provider.
395
00:23:18,930 --> 00:23:20,480
As I was talking about before,
396
00:23:20,481 --> 00:23:23,560
navigation aids you have a
backup camera in your car.
397
00:23:24,440 --> 00:23:26,920
You could have tools to example,
398
00:23:26,921 --> 00:23:31,280
maybe measure the redness of the skin or
the pigment of the skin built into the
399
00:23:31,281 --> 00:23:33,520
system. From a consumer standpoint,
400
00:23:34,190 --> 00:23:38,880
I think all these device improvements
are going to make treatments more
401
00:23:38,881 --> 00:23:43,360
comfortable, safer, and faster.
And that's critical. I mean,
402
00:23:43,361 --> 00:23:48,360
one of the things that's improved
the lasers is I think the
403
00:23:48,800 --> 00:23:50,680
calibrations are tighter.
Everything's tighter.
404
00:23:50,850 --> 00:23:53,960
So I can remember 25 years ago,
405
00:23:53,961 --> 00:23:57,880
we had lasers where the energy would
vary from pulse to pulse by 10 or 20%.
406
00:23:57,881 --> 00:24:01,480
That's largely like 2 to 3% now.
So every pulse is kind of the same.
407
00:24:02,060 --> 00:24:04,480
And these are engineering
improvements and they're largely
408
00:24:06,390 --> 00:24:09,560
driven by more computer control,
409
00:24:10,070 --> 00:24:11,400
more efficient lasers.
410
00:24:11,401 --> 00:24:14,040
We have fiber lasers now that
are inherently more efficient.
411
00:24:14,041 --> 00:24:16,360
So you're going to see a lot of
progress on the engineering front,
412
00:24:16,520 --> 00:24:21,080
which will I think make lasers, like I
said, safer, faster, more comfortable.
413
00:24:21,910 --> 00:24:22,420
Next,
414
00:24:22,420 --> 00:24:25,880
I'm going to ask you to pull out your
crystal ball and make some predictions
415
00:24:25,881 --> 00:24:27,880
about the future. So, Dr. Ross,
416
00:24:28,240 --> 00:24:30,560
what would the realistic
treatment of the future look like?
417
00:24:31,160 --> 00:24:36,120
And do we have reasonable research
options to get there or is industry just
418
00:24:36,440 --> 00:24:39,640
likely to keep developing minor
variations for the next decade?
419
00:24:40,610 --> 00:24:42,820
I think minor variations are
going to drive most of it.
420
00:24:42,821 --> 00:24:45,740
I think the biggest advance might be in
421
00:24:47,620 --> 00:24:52,580
trying to use again tools to
interrogate the skin where you have
422
00:24:52,581 --> 00:24:56,340
a scanner, we go over the skin,
find different pathologies,
423
00:24:56,620 --> 00:25:00,780
and then target those pathologies
accordingly without the provider having to
424
00:25:01,260 --> 00:25:02,420
kind of target them themselves.
425
00:25:02,740 --> 00:25:06,700
So I think that's going to be the
biggest change. These true robotics.
426
00:25:07,020 --> 00:25:09,380
They already have it
with hair restoration.
427
00:25:09,381 --> 00:25:14,260
There's a device that actually finds
the hair follicle and kind of targets it
428
00:25:14,261 --> 00:25:17,260
and drives it out the little
biopsy, these little plugs.
429
00:25:17,261 --> 00:25:21,780
And so I think that's going
to also be seen in the skin
430
00:25:22,640 --> 00:25:25,380
rejuvenation kind of future.
431
00:25:26,420 --> 00:25:29,700
More feedback between
imaging and treatment.
432
00:25:29,701 --> 00:25:34,620
So I think that is going to be the future
or part of the future and that's more
433
00:25:34,621 --> 00:25:35,620
than an incremental change.
434
00:25:35,620 --> 00:25:39,580
But these are expensive changes
for companies to integrate and
435
00:25:40,610 --> 00:25:44,660
it's like this self-driving
car and there's always
going to be some resistance.
436
00:25:44,661 --> 00:25:47,500
But I think that's kind of where
the future might be with lasers,
437
00:25:47,501 --> 00:25:52,140
that you would just press a button and
voila everything happens and I might be
438
00:25:52,141 --> 00:25:56,500
out of business. I don't think I'll
be alive to see that final change,
439
00:25:56,501 --> 00:26:00,220
which is probably good
then I'd have to be an Uber driver.
440
00:26:00,221 --> 00:26:02,500
Well, we won't have Uber drivers
because everything will be self-driving,
441
00:26:02,600 --> 00:26:04,900
but that's sort of the future I think.
442
00:26:04,900 --> 00:26:08,260
Well, Dr. Ross, it has been a
pleasure having you on here.
443
00:26:08,261 --> 00:26:11,420
Thank you for coming on and sharing
your insight and expertise with us.
444
00:26:11,560 --> 00:26:14,860
And thank you to all of our listeners
for joining us today to hear about the
445
00:26:14,861 --> 00:26:18,180
future of high technology devices
like lasers and aesthetic medicine.
446
00:26:18,180 --> 00:26:20,730
You're welcome. I enjoyed the opportunity.
447
00:26:20,950 --> 00:26:25,650
And I'll add my thank you to Dr.
Ross for joining us today and sharing
448
00:26:25,651 --> 00:26:26,690
his expertise.
449
00:26:26,691 --> 00:26:31,610
It's really been wonderful hearing
your viewpoints on what's happening in
450
00:26:31,611 --> 00:26:33,170
this fascinating industry.
451
00:26:33,690 --> 00:26:37,290
Thank you for listening to the Park
Avenue Plastic Surgery Class podcast.
452
00:26:37,580 --> 00:26:40,330
If you enjoyed this episode, be
sure to share it with your friends.
453
00:26:40,331 --> 00:26:43,400
Follow us on Apple Podcasts
and Spotify and leave a review.
454
00:26:43,401 --> 00:26:44,400
We'll see you next time.
455
00:26:45,280 --> 00:26:49,520
Thank you for joining us in this episode
of the Park Avenue Plastic Surgery
456
00:26:49,521 --> 00:26:54,160
Class podcast with Dr. Lawrence
Bass, Park Avenue plastic surgeon,
457
00:26:54,960 --> 00:26:56,800
educator, and technology innovator.
458
00:26:56,900 --> 00:26:59,560
The commentary in this
podcast represents opinion.
459
00:26:59,561 --> 00:27:02,320
This podcast does not
present medical advice,
460
00:27:02,460 --> 00:27:06,640
but rather general information about
plastic surgery that does not necessarily
461
00:27:06,641 --> 00:27:09,840
relate to the specific conditions
of any individual patient.
462
00:27:10,050 --> 00:27:14,880
No doctor patient relationship
is established by listening
to or participating
463
00:27:14,881 --> 00:27:15,714
in this podcast.
464
00:27:15,890 --> 00:27:20,000
Consult your physician to advise you
about your individual healthcare.
465
00:27:20,210 --> 00:27:21,800
If you enjoyed this episode,
466
00:27:21,920 --> 00:27:26,200
please share it with your friends and
be sure to subscribe to our podcast on
467
00:27:26,201 --> 00:27:30,120
Apple Podcasts, Google, Spotify, Stitcher,
468
00:27:30,290 --> 00:27:32,680
or wherever you listen to podcasts.
Vic Ross, MD
Dermatologist
Dermatologist Dr. Vic Ross specializes in laser treatments and is an active researcher on skin rejuvenation approaches. He was elected president of the American Society for Laser Medicine and Surgery (ASLMS) and is an active board member in the American Society of Dermatologic Surgery.